A Fascist Philosopher Helps Us Understand Contemporary Politics was a link off of an article from Slate asking, on the surface, whether it really was fair game and, moreover, our responsibility to note the similarities between the Bush administration and the Third Reich. The argument was mainly focused on the propaganda state question, the ability to seemlessly shift public sympathies away from core democratic values, etc. Have a look, let me know what you think.
The Fascist Philosopher article is another one of those "why do conservatives work this way?" deconstructions that I like so much. The argument seems to have an element of truth if you're willing to examine our current administration as a wanna-be fascist dictatorship, and who isn't?
"In The Concept of the Political, [Fascist philosopher Carl] Schmitt wrote that every realm of human endeavor is structured by an irreducible duality. Morality is concerned with good and evil, aesthetics with the beautiful and ugly, and economics with the profitable and unprofitable. In politics, the core distinction is between friend and enemy. That is what makes politics different from everything else. Jesus's call to love your enemy is perfectly appropriate for religion, but it is incompatible with the life-or-death stakes politics always involves. Moral philosophers are preoccupied with justice, but politics has nothing to do with making the world fairer. Economic exchange requires only competition; it does not demand annihilation. Not so politics."
If you're a Republican or just a good ol' fashioned call-it-like-it-is fascist (I'll leave run-of-the-mill conservatives well out of this) and if this is the basic philosophy you've adopted, what is your rational end? I keep asking that question and not finding a satisfying answer, which makes me think I must be asking the wrong question. Rational end. Silly liberal.
But historically and philosophically there is at least a rationale. One just has to step outside one's liberal democratic box. Yes, many of our current (soon to be former!) leaders aren't idealists on this level so much as opportunists out for their own equivalents of 24-carat gold shower curtains, but in this system there's plenty of room for their contributions, too. When they go too far and get caught, they're readily disposable and make convenient whipping dogs to deflect attention from actual news. The frightening things is that some in our leadership clearly do, God help us, actually appear to follow this stuff.
But this is the part that interests me--Fascist beliefs have never gone out of circulation in the populace.
Here's the anecdotal evidence you'll accuse me of winding up out of all proportion. I can take it. I'm related to and grew up with a community full of these people, so I feel fairly comfortable making the generalization.
Several years ago, there was an amusing/frightening exchange between my right-wing Christian brother-in-law (BIL) who will now stand in for the far- to way-far-right, and the-clever-boy-I-was-dating (CBIWD) a few years ago who will stand in for Democrats.
My brother-in-law favored a government directed by competing Powerful Capitalists. CEOs of large corporations (this was pre-ENRON, I should note, but things haven't changed much for BIL), Rockefellers, Fords and their ilk. He felt power should be based on marketplace standing. He also insisted that this not only fit fine in the democratic model, but was the only way to make it work. The powerful were powerful because of their inherent intelligence and deservedness. They had the best instincts about how to lead us. Business model and all. Competition keeps everyone on their toes, keep them working for society and thus makes society work.
Did I mention that the BIL tends to equate Capitalism, Democracy, and The Will of God? Minor confusion between the material, the social and the spiritual in my POV, but what do I know? I'm well on my way to the First Circle of Hell.
The CBIWD had a nice gift for metaphor, so he melded my BIL's argument into a metaphorical bus in which competing power-holders took control of the wheel. My BIL liked that. Yes. The most powerful person should most certainly drive and direct the bus. They'll get us where we want to go.
Now you might want to go to your home on State Street, but you have no real say. Hopefully, the power-holder also wants to go in your direction. However, the power-holder has some business to take care of on Church Street, so away he goes. Oh, he'll probably circle around to everyone's stop eventually. But his stop is terribly important so we need to stick with his decision. Oh, wait. Competition has just kicked in and now there's a new driver. Hang on folks. We're turning around and heading for K Street. Got some serious bidness to attend to boys--you know what I mean. You want to stop somewhere on the way? Well, maybe, if you can convince me it's worth my while. Hope you've got some big bills, BIL. No? How's that bus workin' for ya now?
Here, I'm afraid, both metaphor and argument ended because my mother said, "Ach, turkey's on the table. Stop fighting and come shove some cranberry sauce and stuffing in your horrible, screaming gobs. Maybe that'll shut you up." (I paraphrase.)
So how do I equate this to fascism?
First off, a bit of back-argument. Pure capitalism thought of as political structure is inherently wrong-headed as it results in too many independent, self-interested drivers. In an equation where individual power is the end, the little people will eventually jump out of their seats and strangle driver after driver, and finally, each other, in increasingly anarchic attempts to get where they want to go. The end state of pure competition is usually some sort of fight to the death.
Politics, leadership of country, the ability to make it all work together despite competition--to bend competition to the greater good--requires the politician. Shudder now and forever hold your peace. I do believe we're married to this people. It's our lot as social beings.
But here we see the roots of a typical right-wing business-oriented belief system. In this view, successful businessmen have a grasp of the world that the rest of us simply don't--they are better. They're there because they deserve to be; they earned it, and more frighteningly, the assumption is that they earned it honestly, following their righteous paths to the American Dream. The People should stand down and trust them to lead. They absolutely should have influence in government, and much more than the average person. A bit of social Darwinism and some serious idealism at work. Mm. Mmmm. Not nearly there yet, but, by God, it begins to taste a bit like fascism.
From that base, it won't take much to turn BIL-man against the Democratic values he claims to hold dear.
- Logic is not his strong point. Belief is.
- He is already driven to worship power and status
- He distrusts the populace (except those who agree with him)
- He distrusts politicians who cater to those portions of the populace he finds disagreeable
- He trusts, nay believes in, politicians who believe as he does and favor the powerful
- He believes it is critical to keep his politicians in power as the country will surely go keeling into disaster and moral decrepitude if he does not
For BIL, the Capitalist-Politician is inherently superior and whatever he needs to do to advance his ideological agenda is valid. Add a frightening war without borders and an appeal to blind patriotism, then a dash of xenophobia and the recipe's not only mixed--that bird's cooked.
This last election was tough for BIL. I don't know how he voted in the end. Had it simply been the issues of torture and government eavesdropping, he wouldn't have had a problem casting his vote. He is driven by reverence for what he thinks he knows and fear of the Other, not by his critical mind. It was the corruption, finally, that got him. It all just went a bit too far.
I think that's the rather fortunate Achilles heel of power and persuasion politics. No matter how much spin doctors scrub the information that goes out, they can't scrub away a whole series of scandals and missteps. There's simply too much evidence piled up. And when too much power gets concentrated in too few greedy, brutal hands, scandals are bound to erupt.
The People speak, misspeak and live to speak again.
The frightening thing is that my BIL is still out there, watching and waiting for the next knight with a facade of shining armor. He isn't worried by brutality or inequity; it's mainly child molestation and the free golf trips that get him down. With time, he is certain he and his kind--the Right Kind--will win out.
His only fear is The People.